--- Attending trademark infringement litigation against Chinese producers on behalf of a famous French jewelry company

--- Initiating trademark infringement litigation against Chinese producers and retailers on behalf of a famous Swiss clock company

--- Acting as counsel of a famous British leather company in litigation against shop owners for unauthorized use of trademark as signage

--- Arranging administrative and criminal raids against infringers on behalf of a German company and a French manufacturer

--- Acting as legal consultant for an European intellectual property service company

--- Initiating criminal procedure against infringers on behalf of a German company

--- Attending civil litigation against piracy on behalf of famous writer

--- Filing civil litigation against a web construction company on behalf of a local government

--- Providing service for Singapore Company in establishing chain stores in China

--- Filing opposition against similar trademark registration application on behalf of a Swiss company

--- Providing trademark watch over services in China for 17 European companies

--- Applying for cancellation of inappropriate enterprise name registration on behalf of a German company, and

--- Retained as standing trademark consultant by a Chinese famous beverage company

--- Taking opposition action against the trademark No. 15140896 in class 18 on behalf of SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A. (Italy), the decision made by the TMO was in favor of the client and recognized that the client’s prior mark “ ” in class 25 is well-known.

--- Taking invalidation action against the trademark No. 11996823 in class 21 on behalf of SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A. (Italy), the decision made by the TRAB was in favor of the client and recognized that the client’s prior mark “ ” in class 25 is well-known.

--- Taking opposition action against the trademark No. 14096636 in class 18 on behalf of SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A. (Italy), the decision made by the TMO was in favor of the client based on client’s prior copyright of “ ” work.

--- Taking invalidation action against the trademark No. 15720594 in class 10 on behalf of New Balance Athletics, Inc. (US), the decision made by the TRAB was in favor of the client and recognized that the client’s prior mark “ ” in class 25 is well-known.

--- Filing administrative litigation against the invalidation decision of trademark No. 9970149 in class 11 on behalf of New Balance Athletics, Inc. (US), the judgment made by Beijing IP Court was in favor of the client and recognized that the client’s prior mark “ ” in class 25 is well-known.

--- Taking invalidation action against the trademark No. 13891983 in class 12 on behalf of STEERPROP LTD. (FINLAND), the decision made by the TRAB was in favor of the client based on client’s prior right of trade name “ ”.

--- Taking opposition action against the trademark No. 22469340 in class 3 on behalf of L＇OCCITANE SA (FRANCE), the decision made by the TRAB was in favor of the client. The TRAB accepted our argument that the disputed mark was filed with bad faith.

--- Taking opposition action against the trademark No. 20918732 in class 25 on behalf of DAMA S.P.A. (Italy), the decision made by the TMO was in favor of the client.

--- Taking review on refusal for the three-dimensional trademark No. 17177266 in class 18 on behalf of SALVATORE FERRAGAMO S.P.A. (Italy), the decision made by the TRAB was in favor of the client.

--- Taking invalidation action against the trademark No. 16893512 in class 28 on behalf of New Balance Athletics, Inc. (US), the decision made by the TRAB was in favor of the client based on Article 44 of the Trademark Law.